More on climate models
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics. This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
   Corn Burners Forum Index » The Environment and Global Warming
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Occam
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 1441
Location: Toledo

PostPosted:Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:35 am    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by Occam

cornheat wrote:
Interesting articles available at www.icecap.us and

http://www.nbr.co.nz/home/column_article.asp?id=21153&cid=39&cname=NBR

Science based upon facts in search of truth will trump hysterical propoganda driven pseudoscience in search of public funding and bureaucratic favor in the long run.

CO2 is natural compound essential to the cycle of life. We live in a carbon based world. Carbon is all around us and essential to all life. Life is good. Humanity is part of the natural world like any other creature, not a foreign intruder introducing discordance into the universe. Energy is good and has fueled the advance of civilization since the discovery of fire. The sun is the source of all light energy and primary driver of climate on planet earth. Climate change happens in cycles from cold to hot to cold to hot according to earth's relationship to its sun and far beyond the inconsequential influence and control of humanity. There is no magic lever to push or chain to pull for small minded bureaucrats to control climate in pursuit of lasting climate security.


Not sure what this has to do with Climate Models, Cornheat. You are merely dishing up a long tedious proclamation of truisms peppered with absurdity. So what was the point of announcing the obvious?. You seem to think that placing an unsupported proposition such as- "far beyond the inconsequential influence and control of humanity" - in the middle of bromides like "energy is good" somehow supports your contention. A contention that defies common sense as well as volumes of scientific research. Even your lead AGW Denier, Pielke, has said "the evidence of a human fingerprint on the global and regional climate is incontrovertible as clearly illustrated in the National Research Council report and in our research papers"

Humanity and you - in so much as you are human - are responsible for the care of the planet and responsible for the consequences of your actions and inactions. Time to grow up, Daddy isn't going to come rescue you when you get into trouble.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
mddorogi
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 1115
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

PostPosted:Thu Apr 10, 2008 6:23 pm    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by mddorogi

Quote:
in the middle of bromides like "energy is good"


Bromides... Fantastic! I'll have to use that at work and see what kind of funny looks I get.
_________________
Mark
Dell Point Europa
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageCorn Burner Brand/Model
Occam
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 1441
Location: Toledo

PostPosted:Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:32 pm    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by Occam

Where the warming comes from...

Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
Occam
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 1441
Location: Toledo

PostPosted:Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:50 pm    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by Occam

How well the climate models track reality



http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4WG1_Print_Ch08.pdf
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
Occam
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 1441
Location: Toledo

PostPosted:Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:24 pm    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by Occam

Short term projections

Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
Occam
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 1441
Location: Toledo

PostPosted:Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:14 am    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by Occam

Water Vapor Feedback Loop Will Cause Accelerated Global Warming, Professor Warns

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090219152132.htm

ScienceDaily (Feb. 20, 2009)

Andrew Dessler, a professor in the Department of Atmospheric Sciences who specializes in research on climate, says that warming due to increases in greenhouse gases will lead to higher humidity in the atmosphere. And because water vapor itself is a greenhouse gas, this will cause additional warming. This process is known as water vapor feedback and is responsible for a significant portion of the warming predicted to occur over the next century.

“It’s a vicious cycle – warmer temperatures mean higher humidity, which in turn leads to even more warming,” Dessler explains.

The perspective by Dessler and co-author Steven Sherwood of the Climate Change Research Centre at the University of New South Wales is published in the journal Science. In the article, they review and summarize the peer-reviewed evidence in support of a strong water vapor feedback and conclude that the evidence supporting it is overwhelming.....

“For years, there was a debate over this mechanism, with some even questioning if the water vapor feedback existed at all. But recent work on this feedback has moved its existence and strength beyond argument,” Dessler adds.....


“Everything shows that the climate models are probably getting the water vapor feedback right,.....
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
xracer
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1529
Location: Michigan

PostPosted:Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:24 pm    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by xracer

Occam wrote:
Water Vapor Feedback Loop Will Cause Accelerated Global Warming, Professor Warns

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090219152132.htm

ScienceDaily (Feb. 20, 2009)

Andrew Dessler, a professor in the Department of Atmospheric Sciences who specializes in research on climate, says that warming due to increases in greenhouse gases will lead to higher humidity in the atmosphere. And because water vapor itself is a greenhouse gas, this will cause additional warming. This process is known as water vapor feedback and is responsible for a significant portion of the warming predicted to occur over the next century.

“It’s a vicious cycle – warmer temperatures mean higher humidity, which in turn leads to even more warming,” Dessler explains.

The perspective by Dessler and co-author Steven Sherwood of the Climate Change Research Centre at the University of New South Wales is published in the journal Science. In the article, they review and summarize the peer-reviewed evidence in support of a strong water vapor feedback and conclude that the evidence supporting it is overwhelming.....

“For years, there was a debate over this mechanism, with some even questioning if the water vapor feedback existed at all. But recent work on this feedback has moved its existence and strength beyond argument,” Dessler adds.....


“Everything shows that the climate models are probably getting the water vapor feedback right,.....


Another polished turd not unlike the Santer et al gem or the Antarctic warming garbage.

http://landshape.org/enm/dessler-zhang-and-yang-fail-significance-tests/
_________________
St. Croix Auburn
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
xracer
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1529
Location: Michigan

PostPosted:Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:29 pm    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by xracer

Occam wrote:
Short term projections



prediction
Noun
1. the act of forecasting in advance
2. something that is forecast in advance

BTW Occam, there is no heat "in the pipeline".
_________________
St. Croix Auburn
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
Occam
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 1441
Location: Toledo

PostPosted:Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:53 am    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by Occam

Quote:
BTW Occam, there is no heat "in the pipeline".


Xracer, your posts are getting more and more enigmatic. I understand your strategy, ie don't make any declarative statements that can be challenged, just ask questions and make irrelevant or ambiguous statements that we are supposed to assume are pregnant with meaning.


Last edited by Occam on Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:56 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
Occam
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 1441
Location: Toledo

PostPosted:Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:45 am    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by Occam

xracer wrote:


prediction
Noun
1. the act of forecasting in advance
2. something that is forecast in advance


Case in point, you don't declare the chart is not a real forecast you post a dictionary definition of forecast, presumably to imply I don't know the definition of forecast or the chart is not a real forecast. But last I heard 2005 and 2025 come after 1990, date of this IPCC forecast.

Or has your programming been changed from automated GW Denier Talking Points Poster to an automated Trolling Dictionary?


Last edited by Occam on Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:27 am; edited 5 times in total
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
Occam
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 1441
Location: Toledo

PostPosted:Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:51 am    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by Occam

Global warming skeptics used to claim the earth was not warming, the warming was an artifact of instrumentation and the urban heat island effect their favorite boogeyman. The scientific basis for this rested mostly on the UAH satellite data which showed no warming 1979 into the late 90s. Only a minority of scientists believed the original satellite data because it was contrary to ocean temperature changes as well as surface temperatures on land and sea and contrary to observed effects of warming like melting glaciers, a shrinking polar icecap and rising sea levels; ie the satellite data was the odd man out.

It was later found that this was caused by a drift problem in the satellite data; this and the small time period covered by the satellite record swamped the warming trend with noise and data bias. The errors were found in the satellite data, the problems corrected and behold the satellites also showed warming. This ended "the globe isn't warming" debate within the scientific community, though it still survives among the less educated skeptics and amongst the professional and zealous amateur GW Deniers.




We now have a 30 year record of satellite data of the troposphere temperature to compare to the surface temperature measurements. You can see they show a nearly identical warming trend. Statistically speaking, we can't say with high confidence whether the surface or troposphere trend is larger or whether they are identical, but we can say they are close to each other and the surface and troposphere have warmed over this period.

You can also see the variance in the annual temperatures about the trend is almost 3x larger in the troposphere than the surface temperature; since it is in the troposphere where the GHG solar amplification takes place, a wider swing in troposphere temperatures were expected by climate theorists.

These and many other data are the reason scientist now say global warming is "unequivocal".


Last edited by Occam on Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:54 pm; edited 8 times in total
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
jdeere5220
Serious Burner
Serious Burner


Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 730
Location: Michigan

PostPosted:Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:37 am    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by jdeere5220

I for one have never claimed that the earth has not warmed. Nor would I claim the earth has not cooled. Of course it has done both, many times.

Looks to me like it has even done both in the chart you are showing us.

I just doubt that mankind has had much to do with it.
_________________
Maxim M250 outdoor corn/pellet burner
Old Beat-up Gravity Box
I support Global Warming
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteCorn Burner Brand/Model
Occam
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 1441
Location: Toledo

PostPosted:Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:49 am    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by Occam

jdeere5220 wrote:
I for one have never claimed that the earth has not warmed. Nor would I claim the earth has not cooled. Of course it has done both, many times.

Looks to me like it has even done both in the chart you are showing us.



In other words you haven't said anything. Hard to refute that.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
Occam
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 1441
Location: Toledo

PostPosted:Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:58 pm    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by Occam

Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
Occam
Super Burner
Super Burner


Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 1441
Location: Toledo

PostPosted:Fri Jul 09, 2010 9:15 pm    Post subject Reply with quoteFind all posts by Occam

Heat Waves Commonplace in the US by 2039

ScienceDaily (July 9, 2010) — Exceptionally long heat waves and other hot events could become commonplace in the United States in the next 30 years, according to a new study by Stanford University climate scientists.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/07/100708122617.htm
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics. This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
   Corn Burners Forum Index » The Environment and Global Warming Page 2 of 3
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

 
Jump to:  



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Thčme myApple v2.0.1 créé par myTemplate